Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malgady, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Colon-Malgady, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Comparing the Reliability of Difference Scores and Residuals in Analysis of Covariance

Robert G. Malgady

Program in Quantitative Studies, New York University

Gerardita Colon-Malgady

Department of Quality Assurance and Risk Management, Terence Cardinal Cooke Health Care Center, New York City

In pretest-posttest designs, residual scores created in the analysis of covariance commonly are preferred to difference scores because the latter suffer from reliability problems. This paper develops the reliability of residuals adjusted for a single covariate for comparison to the reliability of difference scores. Comparisons reveal that little is gained by analysis of covariance, which also suffers from reliability problems as the pretest and posttest reliabilities decrease and as their intercorrelation increases.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 51, No. 4, 803-807 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/001316449105100401


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
W.-C. Wang and W. Chyi-In
Gain Score in Item Response Theory as an Effect Size Measure
Educational and Psychological Measurement, October 1, 2004; 64(5): 758 - 780.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. Jamieson
Measurement of Change and the Law of Initial Values: A Computer Simulation Study
Educational and Psychological Measurement, February 1, 1995; 55(1): 38 - 46.
[Abstract]