Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shechtman, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Revised Group Assessment Procedure for Predicting Initial Teaching Success

Zipora Shechtman

School of Education, University of Haifa, Israel

This study investigated the effectiveness of an abridged group assessment (GA) procedure in predicting initial teaching success, where success was measured largely on the basis of practice teaching evaluations. The sample included 247 graduates of a teacher training college who had been assessed by either the abridged GA (comprised of four dimensions) or the original procedure (nine dimensions) prior to admission. The revised version was found to consistently predict success as effectively as the original procedure, providing a unique contribution to the selection process. In contrast, other admission criteria, measuring intelligence and past scholastic achievement, produced inconsistent results. The dimension of Overall Rating alone best identified low teaching success. In light of these findings, it is recommended that the group assessment procedure be made an integral part of the admission process. The inconsistent contribution of the other admission criteria calls for further research, yet does not justify their omission.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 51, No. 4, 963-974 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/001316449105100416


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Teacher EducationHome page
D. A. Byrnes, G. Kiger, and Z. Shechtman
Evaluating The Use Of Group Interviews To Select Students Into Teacher-Education Programs
Journal of Teacher Education, March 1, 2003; 54(2): 163 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Teacher EducationHome page
Z. Shechtman and L. Godfried
Assessing the Performance and Personal Traits of Teacher Education Students by a Group Assessment Procedure: A Study of Concurrent and Construct Validity
Journal of Teacher Education, March 1, 1993; 44(2): 130 - 138.