Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carver, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reliability and Validity of the Speed of Thinking Test

Ronald P. Carver

University of Missouri-Kansas City

The Speed of Thinking Test (STT) has been developed as a measure of cognitive speed. Individuals must decide quickly whether pairs of letters, such as Ab or aA, have the same name. A group of 129 college students were administered this measure plus the Nelson-Denny Reading Test (NDRT), the Accuracy Level Test (ALT), and the Rate Level Test (RLT). The reliability coefficient for the STT was .80, which was higher than the reliability coefficient for the Comprehension score on the Nelson Denny Reading Test, .68. The SPT correlated .26 with the Rate score on the NDRT, and .60 with the RLT. The STT appears to provide a reasonably reliable and valid method for measuring cognitive speed that may be used to diagnose whether individuals are reading at a rate commensurate with their thinking rate.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 52, No. 1, 125-134 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/001316449205200118


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?