Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Powell, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Shklov, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Obtaining Information about Learners' Thinking Strategies from Wrong Answers on Multiple-Choice Tests

J. C. Powell

Powell Consulting Services Windsor, Ontario, Canada

N. Shklov

Powell Consulting Services Windsor, Ontario, Canada

An age-dependent answer-selection sequence was inferred from earlier studies (Powell, 1968, 1970, 1976 and 1977). These earlier studies suggested, from self-report, interview data, and distractors designed from logic errors, that content-independent thinking strategies (generalized procedures used to solve problems) were employed by students to select their answers to a multiple-choice test when they did not recognize the "correct" answer. The present study replicated the results of previous ones by capturing this developmental sequence using statistical rather than clinical means. The same multiple-choice reading-comprehension test (Gorham, 1956) used in some of these previous studies (Powell, 1968, 1976 and 1977) was administered twice to 2810 students aged 8- to 19+, with a five-month elapsed time between these two administrations. Using a statistical procedure based on the multinomial distribution to interpret single cells in the resulting contingency tables, this set of data was studied for evidence of this systematically-connected age-dependent sequence. It reappeared for all anticipated events within an error factor of less than five months.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 52, No. 4, 847-865 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164492052004005
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?