This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gehrlein, T. M. Articles by Shahani, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Nontraditional Validity Calculations and Differential Interviewer Experience: Implications for Selection Interviews

Rice University

Robert L. Dipboye

Rice University

Comila Shahani

Hofstra University

The traditional way to calculate the criterion-related validity of selection interviews was compared to two nontraditional techniques. College admissions interview ratings were the predictors, and college GPAs were the criteria. Traditional interview-GPA correlations usually were not significant, whereas statistical techniques set forth by Dreher, Ash, and Hancock (1988) and Kenny and La Voie (1985) usually yielded significant validities. The differences were more pronounced when separate analyses were conducted for groups of experienced and inexperienced interviewers. Only the latter ratings provided valid predictors of GPA, and other analyses suggested that the underlying judgments were more complex.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 53, No. 2, 457-469 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164493053002015


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. J. Arce-Ferrer and I. B. Castillo Investigating Postgraduate College Admission Interviews: Generalizability Theory Reliability and Incremental Predictive Validity Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, April 1, 2007; 6(2): 118 - 134. [Abstract] [PDF]