|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
A Confirmatory Factor Analytic Study Examining the Dimensionality of the Raven'S Advanced Progressive Matrices
Winfred Arthur, JR.
Texas A&M University
David J. Woehr
Texas A&M University
The objective of the current study was to provide a direct comparison of two competing views of the underlying structure of the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (APM), a widely used test designed as a nonverbal measure of general cognitive ability (g). The first view postulates a two-factor model to explain the structure of the APM; and the second view, a single-factor model. The results of a confirmatory factor analysis suggest that a single-factor solution seems to be the best representation of the APM's structure. These findings are also consistent with the original development and intended use of the APM as a measure of a unidimensional construct.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 53, No. 2,
471-478 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164493053002016

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Arthur Jr., T. C. Tubre, D. S. Paul, and M. L. Sanchez-Ku
College-Sample Psychometric and Normative Data on a Short Form of the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,
December 1, 1999;
17(4):
354 - 361.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Bors and T. L. Stokes
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices: Norms for First-Year University Students and the Development of a Short Form
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
June 1, 1998;
58(3):
382 - 398.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Kush
Fild-Dependence, Cognitive Ability, and Academic Achievement in Anglo American and Mexican American Students
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
September 1, 1996;
27(5):
561 - 575.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Arthur JR. and D. V. Day
Development of a Short form for the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
June 1, 1994;
54(2):
394 - 403.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|
|
|