Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arthur, W.
Right arrow Articles by Woehr, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Confirmatory Factor Analytic Study Examining the Dimensionality of the Raven'S Advanced Progressive Matrices

Winfred Arthur, JR.

Texas A&M University

David J. Woehr

Texas A&M University

The objective of the current study was to provide a direct comparison of two competing views of the underlying structure of the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (APM), a widely used test designed as a nonverbal measure of general cognitive ability (g). The first view postulates a two-factor model to explain the structure of the APM; and the second view, a single-factor model. The results of a confirmatory factor analysis suggest that a single-factor solution seems to be the best representation of the APM's structure. These findings are also consistent with the original development and intended use of the APM as a measure of a unidimensional construct.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 53, No. 2, 471-478 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164493053002016


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
W. Arthur Jr., T. C. Tubre, D. S. Paul, and M. L. Sanchez-Ku
College-Sample Psychometric and Normative Data on a Short Form of the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, December 1, 1999; 17(4): 354 - 361.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
D. A. Bors and T. L. Stokes
Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices: Norms for First-Year University Students and the Development of a Short Form
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1998; 58(3): 382 - 398.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
J. C. Kush
Fild-Dependence, Cognitive Ability, and Academic Achievement in Anglo American and Mexican American Students
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, September 1, 1996; 27(5): 561 - 575.
[Abstract]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
W. Arthur JR. and D. V. Day
Development of a Short form for the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1994; 54(2): 394 - 403.
[Abstract]