Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benjamin, W. J. J.
Right arrow Articles by White, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure of School Skills

W. J. Jane Benjamin

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Kinnard White

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

The Students' Rating Scale of School Skills (SRSSS), consisting of 48 questions, is a self-report instrument designed to measure seven constructs, namely (a) attention, (b) memory, (c) language, (d) visual/spatial/sequential, (e) motor, (f) higher order cognition, and (g) social cognition. A total of 842 junior high school students completed the SRSSS. A confirmatory factor analysis was performed to examine the construct validity of this instrument. The result did not confirm the hypothesized 7-factor structure of the SRSSS. An exploratory factor analysis was then performed to examine the factor structure. The findings suggested that memory and language subscales may not be separable and some items should be deleted from the subscales. Although the results did not fully support the hypotheses, recommendations were made for future research on scales to measure these constructs.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 53, No. 2, 541-549 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164493053002024


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?