Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Renn, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Icenogle, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Measurement Properties of the Revised Job Diagnostic Survey: More Promising News from the Public Sector

Robert W. Renn

Department of Management Fogelman College of Business and Economics Memphis State University

Paul M. Swiercz

Department of Management Science The George Washington University

Marjorie L. Icenogle

Department of Management Georgia State University

This field study extended research on the measurement properties of the revised Job Diagnostic Survey (JDS). Responses from 219 employees performing jobs in the public-sector and LISREL VII confirmatory factor analysis were used to examine the revised JDS's factor structure. Results supported the revised JDS's hypothesized 5-factor structure but indicated the scales' 3-anchor 7-point response format produced a weak artifactor. Results also demonstrated that the revised JDS exhibited strong criterion-related validity for affective but not behavioral outcomes. Suggestions for further improving the measurement properties of revised JDS are discussed.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 53, No. 4, 1011-1021 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164493053004014
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Hospitality & Tourism ResearchHome page
M. Hancer and R. T. George
Job Satisfaction Of Restaurant Employees: An Empirical Investigation Using The Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire
Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, February 1, 2003; 27(1): 85 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]