Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hofer, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

What Criteria Define a Successful Career in Psychology? it Depends on Who you Ask

Scotit M. Hofer

University of Southern California

Michael C. Stallings

University of Southern California

Chandra A. Reynolds

University of Southern California

Norman Cliff

University of Southern California

Gerald L. Russell

University of California, Los Angeles

Predicting which students have the ability and motivation to become successful psychologists is an endeavor that all graduate psychology departments undertake to some degree. However, before prediction of "success" in psychology can take place, it is first necessary to develop what the important criteria of success in psychology are. For this purpose, the importance of various criteria of academic success in psychology was rated during three different stages of career development. From two universities, 71 faculty and graduate students were surveyed. Results from a series of principle component analyses using orthogonal and oblique rotation methods strongly suggested that there are a relatively large number of factors that are important. A nine-factor solution seemed to provide the best fit to the data, both in terms of conceptual consistency and variance explained. This solution indicated that there is wide diversity of opinion among psychologists as to what are the most important criteria of success in psychology. Such results suggest that the predictive validity of screening devices should be investigated using broader outcome criteria than have been commonly used in the past.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 54, No. 2, 447-458 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164494054002019


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?