Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huitema, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Mckean, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reduced Bias Autocorrelation Estimation:Three Jackknife Methods

Bradley E. Huitema

Western Michigan University

Joseph W. Mckean

Western Michigan University

The effectiveness of jackknife methods in reducing bias in the estimation of the lag-I autocorrelation parameter Pi was evaluated. A Monte Carlo investigation was carried out to study the empirical bias, mean-square error, and variance properties of three jackknife estimators using sample sizes that ranged from 6 through 500. The results demonstrated that these estimators are far less biased in the small sample case than are many other estimators that have been recently investigated. Results on the mean-squared error revealed that the advantage of greatly reduced bias associated with the jackknife estimators does not overcome the disadvantage of increased error variance. Three previously investigated estimators yield smaller mean-squared error than do the jackknife estimators or the conventional estimator at most sample sizes.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 54, No. 3, 654-665 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164494054003008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
B. E. Huitema and J. W. McKean
Tests for the Jackknife Autocorrelation Estimator rQ2
Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 1996; 56(2): 232 - 240.
[Abstract]


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
B. E. Huitema, J. W. McKean, and J. Zhao
The Runs Test for Autocorrelated Errors: Unacceptable Properties
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 1996; 21(4): 390 - 404.
[Abstract] [PDF]