Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kline, T. J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Measurement of Tactical and Strategic Decision Making

Theresa J. B. Kline

University of Calgary

In a series of three studies, the Decision-Making Questionnaire (DMQ) was developed, which assesses individuals on the basis of their effectiveness, confidence, and use of information when making tactical and strategic organizational decisions. In the first study, 28 managers were asked what they would do when confronted with 40 different organizational situations. In the second study, 8 managers rank ordered the appropriateness of the responses given by the managers in the first study. In the third study, 74 managerial and nonmanagerial personnel rank ordered their preferred response to the situations presented, rated their confidence with regard to the rank ordering they had used, rank ordered the importance of the information they used to make the decisions, and indicated the importance of the decision to the organization depicted in the scenario. A series of Friedman two-way ANOVAs was conducted to examine respondent agreement. The 5 tactical and 5 strategic scenarios that were most reliable were retained for further analyses. Tactical and strategic effectiveness scores derived from responses to the 10 scenarios were calculated and correlated with three managerial- and educational-related variables. Statistically significant, but low to moderate coefficients were obtained between the tactical effectiveness score and managerial level r = - .27, salary r = - .28, and education r = - .26. Further, it was shown that tactical and strategic effectiveness scores were unrelated to confidence scores as hypothesized.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 54, No. 3, 745-756 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164494054003021


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?