Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murray-Harvey, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Conceptual and Measurement Properties of the Productivity Environmental Preference Survey as a Measure of Learning Style

Rosalind Murray-Harvey

Flinders University of South Australia

The Productivity Environmental Preference Survey (PEPS) is one of a large number of learning style instruments used by researchers and practitioners to identify differences in the way adult students learn and study. The findings of this study using the PEPS suggest that the Dunn and Dunn Learning Styles Model is not conceptually well-defined. Factor analysis failed to produce the four hypothesized factors identified in the model as (a) Environmental, (b) Emotional, (c) Sociological, and (d) Physical. In the short term (8 weeks), the PEPS has fair test-retest reliability. However, over a longer interval of a year, the test-retest reliability of the PEPS is poor. For an instrument claimed to be measuring stable, inherent characteristics of an individual, this outcome is unsatisfactory. In terms of its utility, the PEPS is easy to administer and interpret. The PEPS variables are easily understood by both students and practitioners and, because an individualized profile is produced, it is less likely that students will be stereotyped on the basis of style using the PEPS than they will using the more simplistic bipolar conceptualizations of students' learning styles.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 54, No. 4, 1002-1012 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164494054004017
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?