This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hopkins, K. D. Articles by Chappell, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Quick Power Estimates for Comparing Proportions

University of Colorado at Boulder

David Chappell

University of South Carolina

Power estimates prior to data collection are an essential part of good research planning. The procedures for estimating power when comparing proportions or percentages are more complex than they are when comparing means. Current procedures for estimating power when comparing two independent proportions are found in sources with limited availability and are confusing to many researchers. Procedures for estimating the power for detecting a difference between two independent proportions require the arcsine transformation of proportions. This transformation is intimidating to many researchers who lack confidence in their mathematical skills. These factors no doubt account, in part, for the fact that power estimates are even less common when comparing proportions than they are when comparing means. In addition, the arcsine transformation robs the "effect size" of some of its intuitive appeal because this metric is unfamiliar and does not consistently correspond to differences in percentages or proportions; it has ambiguous direct meaning. Quick power estimates for detecting a difference in two population proportions are expedient during the early phases of research planning; these estimates are tabled and graphed in this article and facilitate the determination of quick power estimates for various differences between two independent proportions. These estimates are shown to be conservative but quite accurate for most research situations (i.e., when the proportions fall in the range of .25 to .75).

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 54, No. 4, 903-912 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164494054004006


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?