Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jamieson, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Measurement of Change and the Law of Initial Values: A Computer Simulation Study

John Jamieson

Lakehead University

Computer simulations were used to examine the effect of a negative correlation between baseline and change on two measures of change: gain scores and covariance. When a negative correlation resulted from decreasing variance from pretest to posttest, as might be due to the presence of floors or ceilings (the Law of Initial Values) or skewness, gain scores were less powerful than covariance. However, when a negative correlation resulted from measurement error alone, the relative power of gain scores and covariance was unaffected. It was concluded that the correlation between baseline and change, by itself, does not invalidate the use of gain scores. However, when the negative correlation is accompanied by a decrease in variance from pretest to posttest, covariance is a superior index of change.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 55, No. 1, 38-46 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164495055001004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
R. A. Cribbie and J. Jamieson
Structural Equation Models and the Regression Bias for Measuring Correlates of Change
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 2000; 60(6): 893 - 907.
[Abstract] [PDF]