Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wakabayashi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Validity Evidence for the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire in the Japanese Corporate Culture

Marion M. White

James Madison University

Judi McLean Parks

University of Minnesota

Daniel G. Gallagher

James Madison University

Linda A. Tetrault

University of New Haven

Mitsuru Wakabayashi

Nagoya University

This study examined the validity of the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ) as a measure of organizational commitment in the Japanese culture. Results of the LISREL analyses indicated that the 3-factor model was a better fit to the data than either the 1-factor or the 2-factor model. Overall, the results provide support for the cross-cultural applicability of the OCQ to Japanese workers.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 55, No. 2, 278-290 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164495055002012
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
G. A. Gelade, P. Dobson, and K. Auer
Individualism, Masculinity, and the Sources of Organizational Commitment
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, September 1, 2008; 39(5): 599 - 617.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
C. Vandenberghe, F. Stinglhamber, K. Bentein, and T. Delhaise
An Examination of the Cross-Cultural Validity of a Multidimensional Model of Commitment in Europe
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, May 1, 2001; 32(3): 322 - 347.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. Abrams, K. Ando, and S. Hinkle
Psychological Attachment to the Group: Cross-Cultural Differences in Organizational Identification and Subjective Norms as Predictors of Workers' Turnover Intentions
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 1998; 24(10): 1027 - 1039.
[Abstract]