Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hegarty, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Dalton, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Development and Psychometric Properties of the Organizational Diversity Inventory (ODI)

W. Harvey Hegarty

Indiana University

Dan R. Dalton

Indiana University

A newly developed 20-item Organizational Diversity Inventory (ODI) is described. A battery of 200 statements dealing with various aspects of diversity was evaluated as to the statements' relevancy by a diverse group of 40 middle managers. Thirty-five items were selected for further exploration. Four hundred and fifty managerial employees from 27 organizations completed this 35-item inventory. Relying on half of the sample, a factor analytic solution was generated that comprised 20 items and five factors. The second half of the sample was used to cross-validate these results. A structural equations confirmatory factor analysis (LISREL 8.03) also supported these five factors. The resulting factors were labeled (a) Existence of Discrimination, (b) Discrimination Against Specific Groups, (c) Managing Diversity, (d) Actions Regarding Minorities, and (e) Attitudes Toward Religion.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 55, No. 6, 1047-1052 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164495055006014


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Career AssessmentHome page
A. W. Burkard, M. A. Boticki, and M. B. Madson
Workplace Discrimination, Prejudice, and Diversity Measurement: A Review of Instrumentation
Journal of Career Assessment, August 1, 2002; 10(3): 343 - 361.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
N. M. Ashkanasy, C. E.J. Hartel, and C. S. Daus
Diversity and Emotion: The New Frontiers in Organizational Behavior Research
Journal of Management, June 1, 2002; 28(3): 307 - 338.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Career AssessmentHome page
L. T. Eby, C. D. Johnson, and J. E. A. Russell
A Psychometric Review of Career Assessment Tools for Use With Diverse Individuals
Journal of Career Assessment, June 1, 1998; 6(3): 269 - 310.
[Abstract]