Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ludlow, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Haley, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effect of Context in Rating of Mobility Activities in Children with Disabilities: An Assessment Using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory

Larry H. Ludlow

Boston College

Stephen M. Haley

New England Rehabilitation Hospital

The purpose of this article is to examine the extent to which environmental context influences the functional performance (caregiver assistance) ratings of children with severe disabilities. Specifically, we investigated differences in the ratings of functional performance when children were rated by their parents at home and by school rehabilitation personnel when reporting on the same children functioning in an educational setting. We examined the context effect (home versus school setting) as a facet in the multifacet Rasch model. The results indicated that the parents and rehabilitation personnel can both be trained to the level of making similar observational judgments, although the parents tended to be stricter in their ratings.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 56, No. 1, 122-129 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164496056001008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?