Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hong, S.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Faedda, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Refinement of the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale

Sung-Mook Hong

University of Western Sydney, Macarthur

Salvatora Faedda

University of Western Sydney, Macarthur

Data from 3,085 respondents from metropolitan Sydney, Australia were used to refine the 14-item Hong Psychological Reactance Scale. Results consistently showed three problematic items, which led to a refined 11-item scale. A series of factor analyses yielded a distinctive four-factor structure that was perfectly congruent among the total sample and the four subsamples: males, females, university students, and nonuniversity students. Cronbach alpha, split-halfs, and theta coefficients were found to be very satisfactory for the refined scale. The convergent and discriminant validities for the 1 1-item scale were tested with various personality constructs.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 56, No. 1, 173-182 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164496056001014
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
A. El-Alayli, C. J. Myers, T. L. Petersen, and A. L. Lystad
"I Don't Mean to Sound Arrogant, but . . ." The Effects of Using Disclaimers on Person Perception
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2008; 34(1): 130 - 143.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
B. L. Quick and M. T. Stephenson
Further Evidence That Psychological Reactance Can Be Modeled as a Combination of Anger and Negative Cognitions
Communication Research, June 1, 2007; 34(3): 255 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
D. T. Holt, A. A. Armenakis, H. S. Feild, and S. G. Harris
Readiness for Organizational Change: The Systematic Development of a Scale
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, June 1, 2007; 43(2): 232 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]