Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parshall, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kromrey, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Tests of Independence in Contingency Tables with Small Samples: A Comparison of Statistical Power

Cynthia G. Parshall

American College Testing

Jeffrey D. Kromrey

University of South Florida

The chi-square test of independence is a frequently used nonparametric test. Although the Type I error estimates for small-sample chi-square statistics applied to 2 x 2 tables have been relatively thoroughly studied, the Type II error rate (or power) has not been as extensively investigated. Additionally, most of the previous research has been limited to 2 x 2 tables and has not been extended to tables of larger dimensions. The objectives of the present research were (a) to investigate the small-sample power of several statistical tests in 2 x 2 and 3 x 3 contingency tables, and (b) to examine the Type I error rates for these tests under studied conditions. Various marginal distributions, sample sizes, and effect sizes were examined.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 56, No. 1, 26-44 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164496056001002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
H. PAIK
Comments on Neural Networks
Sociological Methods Research, May 1, 2000; 28(4): 425 - 453.
[Abstract] [PDF]