Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herold, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rensvold, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Individual Dirences in the Generation and Processing of Performance Feedback

David M. Herold

Georgia Institute of Technology

Charles K. Parsons

Georgia Institute of Technology

Roger B. Rensvold

City University of Hong Kong

This article describes the development of three domain-specific measures of individual differences in feedback propensities. In a series of studies, the authors identify the primary dimensions, psychometric characteristics, and construct validation evidence for internal ability, internal propensity, and external propensity for feedback. Confirmatory factor analysis supports the three dimensional representation. Correlations between the new scales and existing measures of personality are consistent with theoretical predictions. Theoretical and practical extensions of the current work are discussed.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 56, No. 1, 5-25 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164496056001001
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Organizational Research MethodsHome page
G. W. Cheung and R. B. Rensvold
The Effects of Model Parsimony and Sampling Error on the Fit of Structural Equation Models
Organizational Research Methods, July 1, 2001; 4(3): 236 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organizational Research MethodsHome page
R. B. Rensvold and G. W. Cheung
Identification of Influential Cases in Structural Equation Models Using the Jackknife Method
Organizational Research Methods, July 1, 1999; 2(3): 293 - 308.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
M. M. Greller
Participation in the Performance Appraisal Review: Inflexible Manager Behavior and Variable Worker Needs
Human Relations, August 1, 1998; 51(8): 1061 - 1083.
[Abstract] [PDF]