Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duan, B.
Right arrow Articles by Dunlap, W. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Accuracy of Different Methods for Estimating the Standard Error of Correlations Corrected for Range Restriction

Bin Duan

Tulane University

William P. Dunlap

Tulane University

A Monte Carlo study was conducted to compare the accuracy of different estimates of the standard error of correlations corrected for restriction in range. It was found that the procedure suggested by P. Bobko and A. Rieck, also derived by N. S. Raju and colleagues, generated the most accurate estimates of the standard error compared to other existing procedures. The study also repeated previous findings that Pearson correlations corrected for restriction in range resulted in more accurate estimates of the population rho than did the restricted correlations, but the accuracy of the approximation of population rho decreased as the selection criterion became higher. Another finding of the study was that the standard error of correlations under range restriction tended to increase as the selection ratios decreased.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 57, No. 2, 254-265 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164497057002005
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?