Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salter, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Forney, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Test-Retest of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: An Examination of Dominant Functioning

Daniel W. Salter

Pennsylvania State University

Nancy J. Evans

Pennsylvania State University

Deanna S. Forney

Western Illinois University

A test-retest study of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator over 20 months yielded findings similar to those in previous studies of the instrument. However, an additional examination of type dynamics using loglinear analyses indicated that dominant thinking and dominant sensing did not retest as well as did dominant intuition and feeling for this group of 99 master's students. Although the psychometric properties of the instrument could have been a factor, environmental presses appeared to have been the primary influence on these results.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 57, No. 4, 590-597 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164497057004005
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
J. Michael
Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as a Tool for Leadership Development? Apply With Caution
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, January 1, 2003; 10(1): 68 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]