Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gable, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, E. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Assessing Student Perceptions of Affective Outcomes of Special Education Programs: Instrument Development, Validation, and Comparisons to Regular Education Students

Robert K. Gable

University of Connecticut

Chauncy N. Rucker

University of Connecticut

Everett V. Smith, JR.

University of Oklahoma

The development of the 45-item likert-type response scale Student Survey for assessing the following five affective goals of Connecticut's Common Core of Learning is described: Academic Competence, Social Competence, Social Integration, Involvement in Educational Decision Making, and Consumer Satisfaction. Content validity literature-based and judgmental procedures are described; supportive evidence of construct validity is provided using a sample of 436 special education students (Grades 4, 6, and 8) from eight school districts who were eligible to take the statewide Connecticut Mastery Test. These data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory techniques. Alpha reliabilities for the special education sample ranged from .70 to .91 for the five dimensions. Differences between special education students and a sample of 1,229 regular education students from the same districts are described.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 57, No. 4, 685-697 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164497057004012


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?