Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levin, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reviews

Book Reviews

To Test or Not to Test Ho?

Joel R. Levin

University of Wisconsin-Madison

The impressive 1997 edited volume What If There Were No Significance Tests? is reviewed. The book is applauded for its comprehensive consideration of the pros and cons of statistical hypothesis testing (and alternatives) in psychological and educational research. The highlights of each chapter are summarized along with each contributor's presumed stance on the focal to-test-or-not-to-test question. Also included is the reviewer's personal set of recommendations for transforming statistical hypothesis testing, as it is currently practiced, into an intelligent process that is capable of yielding more informative scientific retums.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 58, No. 2, 313-333 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164498058002015
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
R. Hubbard and P. A. Ryan
Statistical Significance with Comments by Editors of Marketing Journals: The Historical Growth of Statistical Significance Testing in Psychology--and its Future Prospects
Educational and Psychological Measurement, October 1, 2000; 60(5): 661 - 681.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
J. R. Levin and D. H. Robinson
Research news and Comment: Rejoinder: Statistical Hypothesis Testing, Effect-Size Estimation, and the Conclusion Coherence of Primary Research Studies
Educational Researcher, January 1, 2000; 29(1): 34 - 36.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Theory PsychologyHome page
R. W. Frick
Defending the Statistical Status Quo
Theory Psychology, April 1, 1999; 9(2): 183 - 189.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
H. J. Keselman, C. J. Huberty, L. M. Lix, S. Olejnik, R. A. Cribbie, B. Donahue, R. K. Kowalchuk, L. L. Lowman, M. D. Petoskey, J. C. Keselman, et al.
Statistical Practices of Educational Researchers: An Analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA Analyses
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1998; 68(3): 350 - 386.
[Abstract] [PDF]