Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Banerji, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ferron, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Construct Validity of Scores on a Developmental Assessment with Mathematical Patfierns Tasks

Madhabi Banerji

University of South Florida

John Ferron

University of South Florida

Three analytic approaches were employed within the framework of classical test theory to examine construct validity of a mathematics assessment made up of 16 ordered constructed-response tasks. The tasks focused on problem solving by identifying and explaining mathematical patterns. Descriptive analyses across four age groups suggested a developmental structure of individual tasks and subdomains that was generally consistent with the intended design of the test. Acceptable fit was obtained using structural equation modeling procedures for a five-factor, first-order structure with directional paths specified (RMSEA = .068) and for two second-order factors (RMSEA = .068). Convergent validity coefficients with standardized tests in mathematics computation, concepts of numbers, and applications indicated a modest overlap in constructs across the two assessments (r = .47) with Stanford Achievement Test (SAT) total mathematics scores. Findings are discussed with reference to intended uses of the assessment and its scores in the context of current mathematics education reforms.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 58, No. 4, 634-660 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164498058004007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?