Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rensvold, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Cheung, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Testing Measurement Models for Factorial Invariance: A Systematic Approach

Roger B. Rensvold

City University of Hong Kong

Gordon W. Cheung

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Comparing different groups (e.g., cultures, age cohorts) using survey-type instruments raises the question of factorial invariance, that is, whether or not members of different groups ascribe the same meanings to survey items. This article attempts to advance multi-group research by (a) providing a concise summary of the factorial invariance problem, (b) proposing a simplified notation intended to facilitate discussion of the problem, and (c) suggesting a structured approach for testing large models. This procedure is illustrated using an extended example. Two computer programs designed to make the recommended procedures less laborious are offered.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 58, No. 6, 1017-1034 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164498058006010


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AssessmentHome page
K. J. Zullig, R. M. Ward, K. A. King, J. M. Patton, and K. A. Murray
Testing the Feasibility of Developmental Asset Measures on College Students to Guide Health Promotion Efforts
Assessment, March 1, 2009; 16(1): 31 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
N. Gregg, D. L. Bandalos, C. Coleman, J. M. Davis, K. Robinson, and J. Blake
The Validity of a Battery of Phonemic and Orthographic Awareness Tasks for Adults With and Without Dyslexia and Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Remedial and Special Education, June 1, 2008; 29(3): 175 - 190.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
J. B. Billiet and E. Davidov
Testing the Stability of an Acquiescence Style Factor Behind Two Interrelated Substantive Variables in a Panel Design
Sociological Methods Research, May 1, 2008; 36(4): 542 - 562.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
T. Lucas, M. R. Parkhill, C. A. Wendorf, E. Olcay Imamoglu, C. C. Weisfeld, G. E. Weisfeld, and Jiliang Shen
Cultural and Evolutionary Components of Marital Satisfaction: A Multidimensional Assessment of Measurement Invariance
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 1, 2008; 39(1): 109 - 123.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
A. J. Arce-Ferrer
An Investigation Into the Factors Influencing Extreme-Response Style: Improving Meaning of Translated and Culturally Adapted Rating Scales
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2006; 66(3): 374 - 392.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
M. Wang and S. S. Russell
Measurement Equivalence of the Job Descriptive Index Across Chinese and American Workers: Results from Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Item Response Theory
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2005; 65(4): 709 - 732.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
J. Welkenhuysen-Gybels, J. Billiet, and B. Cambre
Adjustment for Acquiescence in the Assessment of the Construct Equivalence of Likert-Type Score Items
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, November 1, 2003; 34(6): 702 - 722.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
A. J. Arce-Ferrer and J. J. Ketterer
The Effect of Scale Tailoring for Cross-Cultural Application on Scale Reliability and Construct Validity
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2003; 63(3): 484 - 501.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
R. J. Vandenberg
Toward a Further Understanding of and Improvement in Measurement Invariance Methods and Procedures
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2002; 5(2): 139 - 158.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Comparative SociologyHome page
B. Cambre, J. Welkenhuysen-Gybels, and J. Billiet
Is It Content or Style? An Evaluation of Two Competitive Measurement Models Applied to a Balanced Set of Ethnocentrism Items
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, February 1, 2002; 43(1): 1 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
G. W. Cheung and R. B. Rensvold
Assessing Extreme and Acquiescence Response Sets in Cross-Cultural Research Using Structural Equations Modeling
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, March 1, 2000; 31(2): 187 - 212.
[Abstract] [PDF]