Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, N. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hay, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Construct Validity of Attributional Style: Modeling Context-Dependent Item Sets in the Attributional Style Questionnaire

N. C. Higgins

higgins{at}unbc.ca

Bruno D. Zumbo

zumbob{at}unbc.ca.

Jana L. Hay

University of Northern British Columbia

The format of the Attributional Style Questionnaire (ASQ) lends itself to a consideration of context-dependent item sets (CDIS) and a reevaluation of the factor structure of the questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis of data from 1,346 ASQ respondents revealed that adequate fit was provided by a three-factor (locus, stability, globality) attributional style model that included CDIS. The findings demonstrated that CDIS introduced extra covariation in people’s responses to the ASQ events—covariation that has been accounted for in the past as person (latent) variables or not accounted for at all. The authors argue for the inclusion of CDIS in psychometric models of the ASQ and in models of other attributional style measures that have the same format as the ASQ. In addition, when measuring attributional style, one must account for the person in the situations that are relevant to the style—CDIS allow one to do so.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 59, No. 5, 804-820 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/00131649921970152
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
R. P. Bentall, G. Rowse, N. Shryane, P. Kinderman, R. Howard, N. Blackwood, R. Moore, and R. Corcoran
The Cognitive and Affective Structure of Paranoid Delusions: A Transdiagnostic Investigation of Patients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders and Depression
Arch Gen Psychiatry, March 1, 2009; 66(3): 236 - 247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]