Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hess, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, B. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Factor Structure of the Rahim Leader Power Inventory (Rlpi) with Clinical Female Student Supervisees

Carla W. Hess

Barry T. Wagner

University of North Dakota

The purpose of the present study was to test the construct validity of scores based on the five-factor structure (i.e., the five power bases) of the Rahim Leader Power Inventory (RLPI) when administered to student clinical supervisees. A sample of 276 female graduate students enrolled in clinical practica in speech-language pathology provided perceptions of their supervisors’ use of power. Factor analytic methods were used to identify factors for comparison to those that had emerged in the RLPI standardization study of a national random sample of 476 executives. The five-factor structure of the RLPI was substantiated with these clinical supervisees.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 59, No. 6, 1004-1015 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/00131649921970314


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
R. K. Henson and J. K. Roberts
Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Published Research: Common Errors and Some Comment on Improved Practice
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2006; 66(3): 393 - 416.
[Abstract] [PDF]