Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Viswesvaran, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ones, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Measurement Error in "Big Five Factors" Personality Assessment: Reliability Generalization across Studies and Measures

Chockalingam Viswesvaran

Florida International University

Deniz S. Ones

University of Minnesota

Meta-analysis was used to cumulate reliabilities of personality scale scores. A total of 848 coefficients of stability and 1,359 internal consistency reliabilities across the Big Five factors of personality were examined. The frequency-weighted mean coefficients of stability were .75 (SD = .10, K = 221), .76 (SD = .12, K = 176), .71 (SD = .13, K = 139), .69 (SD = .14, K = 119), and .72 (SD = .13, K = 193) for Emotional Stability, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness, respectively. The corresponding internal consistency reliabilities were .78 (SD = .11, K = 370), .78 (SD = .09, K = 307), .73 (SD = .12, K = 251), .75 (SD = .11, K = 123), and .78 (SD = .10, K = 307). Sample-size-weighted means also were computed. The dimension of personality being rated does not appear to strongly moderate either the internal consistency or the testretest reliabilities. Implications for personality assessment are discussed.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 60, No. 2, 224-235 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/00131640021970475


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
H. Le, F. L. Schmidt, and D. J. Putka
The Multifaceted Nature of Measurement Artifacts and Its Implications for Estimating Construct-Level Relationships
Organizational Research Methods, January 1, 2009; 12(1): 165 - 200.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
R. T. Howell and A. L. Shields
The File Drawer Problem in Reliability Generalization: A Strategy to Compute a Fail-Safe N With Reliability Coefficients
Educational and Psychological Measurement, February 1, 2008; 68(1): 120 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
C. Mason, R. Allam, and M. T. Brannick
How to Meta-Analyze Coefficient-of-Stability Estimates: Some Recommendations Based on Monte Carlo Studies
Educational and Psychological Measurement, October 1, 2007; 67(5): 765 - 783.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. S. Campbell, S. Pulos, M. Hogan, and F. Murry
Reliability Generalization of the Psychopathy Checklist Applied in Youthful Samples
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2005; 65(4): 639 - 656.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
A. R. Hakstian and E.-L. Ng
Employment-Related Motivational Distortion: Its Nature, Measurement, and Reduction
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2005; 65(3): 405 - 441.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
D. J. Ryngala, A. L. Shields, and J. C. Caruso
Reliability Generalization of the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale
Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 2005; 65(2): 259 - 271.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
W. Van Den Noortgate and P. Onghena
Multilevel Meta-Analysis: A Comparison with Traditional Meta-Analytical Procedures
Educational and Psychological Measurement, October 1, 2003; 63(5): 765 - 790.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
S. N. Beretvas and D. A. Pastor
Using Mixed-Effects Models In Reliability Generalization Studies
Educational and Psychological Measurement, February 1, 2003; 63(1): 75 - 95.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
J. Michael
Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as a Tool for Leadership Development? Apply With Caution
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, January 1, 2003; 10(1): 68 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
D. M. Dimitrov
Reliability: Arguments for Multiple Perspectives and Potential Problems with Generalization across Studies
Educational and Psychological Measurement, October 1, 2002; 62(5): 783 - 801.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
T. Vacha-Haase, R. K. Henson, and J. C. Caruso
Reliability Generalization: Moving toward Improved Understanding and Use of Score Reliability
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2002; 62(4): 562 - 569.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
R. M. Capraro and M. M. Capraro
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Score Reliability Across: Studies a Meta-Analytic Reliability Generalization Study
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2002; 62(4): 590 - 602.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. E. Nilsson, C. K. Schmidt, and W. D. Meek
Reliability Generalization: An Examination of the Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2002; 62(4): 647 - 658.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
B. Thompson and C. Cook
Stability of the Reliability of LibQual+TM Scores a Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis Study
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2002; 62(4): 735 - 743.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
T. Vacha-Haase, C. R. Tani, L. R. Kogan, R. A. Woodall, and B. Thompson
Reliability Generalization: Exploring Reliability Variations on MMPI/MMPI-2 Validity Scale Scores
Assessment, December 1, 2001; 8(4): 391 - 401.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. C. Caruso, K. Witkiewitz, A. Belcourt-Dittloff, and J. D. Gottlieb
Reliability of Scores from the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire: A Reliability Generalization Study
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2001; 61(4): 675 - 689.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
M. M. Capraro, R. M. Capraro, and R. K. Henson
Measurement Error of Scores on the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale across Studies
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2001; 61(3): 373 - 386.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
R. K. Henson, L. R. Kogan, and T. Vacha-Haase
A Reliability Generalization Study of the Teacher Efficacy Scale and Related Instruments
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2001; 61(3): 404 - 420.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
S. J. Rubenzer, T. R. Faschingbauer, and D. S. Ones
Assessing the U.S. Presidents Using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory
Assessment, December 1, 2000; 7(4): 403 - 419.
[Abstract] [PDF]