Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirschfeld, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Does Revising the Intrinsic and Extrinsic Subscales of the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form Make a Difference?

Robert R. Hirschfeld

Louisiana State Universityrhirsc1{at}LSU.edu.

This study compared the original intrinsic and extrinsic subscales of the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire short form to revised subscales using data from two samples. The revised subscales were formed according to critiques by several researchers. Confirmatory factor analysis of the original and revised subscales supported the discriminant validity of scores on the intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction measures. Several hierarchical regression models were tested that included job involvement, overall job satisfaction, and volitional absence variables, in addition to the job satisfaction components. The analyses from both samples indicated that revising the intrinsic and extrinsic subscales made little difference in the results obtained.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 60, No. 2, 255-270 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/00131640021970493


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesHome page
Z. R. Hinduan, E. Wilson-Evered, S. Moss, and E. Scannell
Leadership, work outcomes and openness to change following an Indonesian bank merger
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, April 1, 2009; 47(1): 59 - 78.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesHome page
F. Edgar and A. J. Geare
Employee voice on human resource management
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, December 1, 2005; 43(3): 361 - 380.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Hospitality & Tourism ResearchHome page
M. Hancer and R. T. George
Job Satisfaction Of Restaurant Employees: An Empirical Investigation Using The Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire
Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, February 1, 2003; 27(1): 85 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]