This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Barnette, J. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Effects of Stem and Likert Response Option Reversals on Survey Internal Consistency: If You Feel the Need, There is a Better Alternative to Using those Negatively Worded Stems

The University of Iowajack-barnette{at}uiowa.edu.

The controversy with regard to using reverse or negatively worded survey stems has been around for several decades; it is a practice of questionable utility intended to guard against acquiescence or response set behaviors. A 2 x 3 design in which item stem direction and item response pattern direction were crossed was used to determine effects on internal consistency reliability as measured by Cronbach’s alpha. The condition having the highest alpha was when all directly worded stems were used with bidirectional response options. Alpha was higher and accounted for at least 10%, and in one case 20%, higher internal consistency as compared with any of the three conditions in which negatively worded stems were used. This would indicate that the use of all directly worded stems and half of the response options going in one direction and half going in the other direction may be a better way of guarding against acquiescence and response set behaviors than the use of items with negatively worded stems.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 60, No. 3, 361-370 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/00131640021970592


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Lijuan Wang, C. MacCann, Xiaohua Zhuang, O. L. Liu, and R. D. Roberts Assessing Teamwork and Collaboration in High School Students: A Multimethod Approach Canadian Journal of School Psychology, June 1, 2009; 24(2): 108 - 124. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. I. McClelland and M. Fine Embedded Science: Critical Analysis of Abstinence-Only Evaluation Research Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies, February 1, 2008; 8(1): 50 - 81. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. J. Arce-Ferrer An Investigation Into the Factors Influencing Extreme-Response Style: Improving Meaning of Translated and Culturally Adapted Rating Scales Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2006; 66(3): 374 - 392. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Taylor, T. S. C. Kwan-Gett, and E. M. McMahon Jr Effectiveness of an Educational Intervention in Modifying Parental Attitudes About Antibiotic Usage in Children Pediatrics, May 1, 2003; 111(5): e548 - 554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Penny Exploring Differential Item Functioning in a 360-Degree Assessment: Rater Source and Method of Delivery Organizational Research Methods, January 1, 2003; 6(1): 61 - 79. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. M. Dimitrov Reliability: Arguments for Multiple Perspectives and Potential Problems with Generalization across Studies Educational and Psychological Measurement, October 1, 2002; 62(5): 783 - 801. [Abstract] [PDF]