Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snetzler, S.
Right arrow Articles by Qualls, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Examination of Differential Item Functioning on a Standardized Achievement Battery with Limited English Proficient Students

Suzi Snetzler

Audrey L. Qualls

University of Iowa

This study examines the incidence of differential item functioning (DIF) on three subtests of the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills. Test scores for 2,867 Alaskan students categorized as native Alaskan or White were available at two points in time: fourth and sixth grade or sixth and eighth grade. Analysis of language proficiency was conducted exclusively on native Alaskans classified according to one of three language proficiency categories: limited English, bilingual, or English proficient. Although a consistent decrease in effect-size change over time was observed in the comparison between bilinguals and English proficient students, the incidence of DIF tended to be sporadic in terms of which group was favored. Recognizing the inseparable link between language and cultural/ethnic background, an additional DIF analysis comparing Whites to native Alaskans of equal English proficiency was conducted to enhance understanding of the language comparison. Effect-size differences, favoring Whites, were much larger than those observed in the language comparisons.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 60, No. 4, 564-577 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/00131640021970727


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?