Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Embretson, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Prenovost, L. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Dynamic Cognitive Testing: What Kind of Information is Gained by Measuring Response Time and Modifiability?

Susan E. Embretson

L. Katherine Prenovost

University of Kansas

Although ability testing relies on static measures, these measures are often viewed as inappropriate for assessing learning potential. Learning processes are measured in contemporary cognitive psychology studies from processing durations while solving tasks and from the responsiveness of performance to changing conditions. This study examines the structure and nature of two learning process measures: response time and cognitive modifiability. Two primary questions are addressed: Do learning process measures represent different constructs than traditional static ability measures? and Do learning process measures rely more on other domains (e.g., personality, motivation) than do static measures? Results indicate that some learning process measures are sensitive to individual differences independent from static learning measures. Furthermore, the learning process specific variance is only partially explained by the other domains. However, the relationship of the learning process measures to static ability and to the other domains depends on the specific ability measured and the testing condition’s design.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 60, No. 6, 837-863 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/00131640021970943


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
E. L. Grigorenko
Dynamic Assessment and Response to Intervention: Two Sides of One Coin
J Learn Disabil, March 1, 2009; 42(2): 111 - 132.
[Abstract] [PDF]