This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Childs, R. A. Articles by Oppler, S. H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Implications of Test Dimensionality for Unidimensional Irt Scoring: An Investigation of a High-Stakes Testing Program

University of Toronto

Scott H. Oppler

American Institutes for Research

Determining whether a test violates the assumption of unidimensionality is an important precursor to item response theory (IRT) analysis. However, a test’s unidimensionality or nonunidimensionality may be a matter of degree, and the implications of the degree of nonunidimensionality may depend on how the test is analyzed and how the results are to be used. This study examined the dimensionality of a high-stakes graduate training selection test and the implications of the test’s dimensionality for the IRT calibration and scoring of each section of the test. The dimensionality analyses suggested that, although the items within each of the sections were not completely homogeneous, neither were they clearly measuring distinct constructs corresponding to the content disciplines. The correlations between student scores based on item parameters that were estimated separately within discipline and then formed into weighted composites and scores based on item parameters that were estimated across discipline (within section) exceeded .99.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 60, No. 6, 939-955 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/00131640021971005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?