Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caruso, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gottlieb, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reliability of Scores from the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire: A Reliability Generalization Study

John C. Caruso

Katie Witkiewitz

Annie Belcourt-Dittloff

Jennifer D. Gottlieb

University of Montana

A reliability generalization study was conducted on data from 69 samples found in 44 studies that employed the Psychoticism (P), Extraversion (E), Neuroticism (N), and Lie (L) scales of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) or EPQ-Revised. The reliability of the scores varied considerably between scales, with P scores tending to have the lowest reliability. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that a larger standard deviation of scores was associated with higher score reliability for all four EPQ scales. More variability in age was associated with higher score reliability for the P scale and the L scale. Samples composed of students provided scores with higher reliability than those composed of other types of individuals for the P scale. Several other potential predictors (form, language of administration, average score, average age, gender composition, and number of items per scale) were not significantly related to score reliability.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 61, No. 4, 675-689 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/00131640121971437


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
K. R. Rexrode, S. Petersen, and S. O'Toole
The Ways of Coping Scale: A Reliability Generalization Study
Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 2008; 68(2): 262 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
V. Egan, B. Kavanagh, and M. Blair
Sexual Offenders Against Children: The Influence of Personality and Obsessionality on Cognitive Distortions
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, July 1, 2005; 17(3): 223 - 240.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
D. J. Ryngala, A. L. Shields, and J. C. Caruso
Reliability Generalization of the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale
Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 2005; 65(2): 259 - 271.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
A. L. Shields and J. C. Caruso
A Reliability Induction and Reliability Generalization Study of the Cage Questionnaire
Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 2004; 64(2): 254 - 270.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
W. Van Den Noortgate and P. Onghena
Multilevel Meta-Analysis: A Comparison with Traditional Meta-Analytical Procedures
Educational and Psychological Measurement, October 1, 2003; 63(5): 765 - 790.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
S. N. Beretvas and D. A. Pastor
Using Mixed-Effects Models In Reliability Generalization Studies
Educational and Psychological Measurement, February 1, 2003; 63(1): 75 - 95.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
D. M. Dimitrov
Reliability: Arguments for Multiple Perspectives and Potential Problems with Generalization across Studies
Educational and Psychological Measurement, October 1, 2002; 62(5): 783 - 801.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
T. Vacha-Haase, R. K. Henson, and J. C. Caruso
Reliability Generalization: Moving toward Improved Understanding and Use of Score Reliability
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2002; 62(4): 562 - 569.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. E. Nilsson, C. K. Schmidt, and W. D. Meek
Reliability Generalization: An Examination of the Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2002; 62(4): 647 - 658.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
K. A. Wallace and A. J. Wheeler
Reliability Generalization of the Life Satisfaction Index
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2002; 62(4): 674 - 684.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
H. K. Deditius-Island and J. C. Caruso
An Examination of the Reliability of Scores from Zuckerman's Sensation Seeking Scales, Form V
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2002; 62(4): 728 - 734.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
B. Thompson and C. Cook
Stability of the Reliability of LibQual+TM Scores a Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis Study
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2002; 62(4): 735 - 743.
[Abstract] [PDF]