|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Differential Item Functioning in the Wisc-III: Item Parameters for Boys and Girls in the National Standardization Sample
Susan J. Maller
Purdue UniversityMaller{at}purdue.edu
The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for ChildrenThird Edition (WISC-III) is the most widely used test of intelligence in the world. However, the manual for the WISC-III provides insufficient detail regarding the detection of differential item functioning (DIF). The WISC-III national standardization sample (N = 2,200) was used to investigate DIF in six WISC-III subtests. After fitting two parameter logistic and graded response models to the data, items were tested for DIF using the item response theory likelihood ratio DIF detection method. Of the 151 items studied, 52 were found to function differently across groups. The magnitude of the DIF was also considered by examining (a) parameter differences between groups and (b) root mean squared probability differences. Because the scores of boys and girls may be composed of different items systematically scored as correct, their IQs cannot be assumed to have the same meaning. Further investigations of item content bias are recommended.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 61, No. 5,
793-817 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/00131640121971527

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Immekus and S. J. Maller
Item Parameter Invariance of the Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test Across Male and Female Samples
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
December 1, 2009;
69(6):
994 - 1012.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. D. Thombs
Book Review: James Georgas, Lawrence G. Weiss, Fons J.R. van de Vijver, & Donald H. Saklofske (Eds.), Culture and Children's Intelligence: Cross-Cultural Analysis of the WISC-III. San Diego: Academic Press, 2003. 336 pp. Cloth: $89.95 (US), ISBN 0122800559
Transcultural Psychiatry,
December 1, 2008;
45(4):
708 - 711.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Holmes Finch and B. F. French
Detection of Crossing Differential Item Functioning: A Comparison of Four Methods
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
August 1, 2007;
67(4):
565 - 582.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. F. French and S. J. Maller
Iterative Purification and Effect Size Use With Logistic Regression for Differential Item Functioning Detection
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
June 1, 2007;
67(3):
373 - 393.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T.-I. Pae and G.-P. Park
Examining the relationship between differential item functioning and differential test functioning
Language Testing,
October 1, 2006;
23(4):
475 - 496.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W.-C. Wang and M. Wilson
Assessment of Differential Item Functioning in Testlet-Based Items Using the Rasch Testlet Model
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
August 1, 2005;
65(4):
549 - 576.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Uiterwijk and T. Vallen
Linguistic sources of item bias for second generation immigrants in Dutch tests
Language Testing,
April 1, 2005;
22(2):
211 - 234.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W.-C. Wang and Y.-H. Su
Factors Influencing the Mantel and Generalized Mantel-Haenszel Methods for the Assessment of Differential Item Functioning in Polytomous Items
Applied Psychological Measurement,
November 1, 2004;
28(6):
450 - 480.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T.-I. Pae
DIF for examinees with different academic backgrounds
Language Testing,
January 1, 2004;
21(1):
53 - 73.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|