Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maller, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Differential Item Functioning in the Wisc-III: Item Parameters for Boys and Girls in the National Standardization Sample

Susan J. Maller

Purdue UniversityMaller{at}purdue.edu

The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Third Edition (WISC-III) is the most widely used test of intelligence in the world. However, the manual for the WISC-III provides insufficient detail regarding the detection of differential item functioning (DIF). The WISC-III national standardization sample (N = 2,200) was used to investigate DIF in six WISC-III subtests. After fitting two parameter logistic and graded response models to the data, items were tested for DIF using the item response theory likelihood ratio DIF detection method. Of the 151 items studied, 52 were found to function differently across groups. The magnitude of the DIF was also considered by examining (a) parameter differences between groups and (b) root mean squared probability differences. Because the scores of boys and girls may be composed of different items systematically scored as correct, their IQs cannot be assumed to have the same meaning. Further investigations of item content bias are recommended.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 61, No. 5, 793-817 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/00131640121971527


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. C. Immekus and S. J. Maller
Item Parameter Invariance of the Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test Across Male and Female Samples
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 2009; 69(6): 994 - 1012.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Transcultural PsychiatryHome page
B. D. Thombs
Book Review: James Georgas, Lawrence G. Weiss, Fons J.R. van de Vijver, & Donald H. Saklofske (Eds.), Culture and Children's Intelligence: Cross-Cultural Analysis of the WISC-III. San Diego: Academic Press, 2003. 336 pp. Cloth: $89.95 (US), ISBN 0122800559
Transcultural Psychiatry, December 1, 2008; 45(4): 708 - 711.
[PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
W. Holmes Finch and B. F. French
Detection of Crossing Differential Item Functioning: A Comparison of Four Methods
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2007; 67(4): 565 - 582.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
B. F. French and S. J. Maller
Iterative Purification and Effect Size Use With Logistic Regression for Differential Item Functioning Detection
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2007; 67(3): 373 - 393.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
T.-I. Pae and G.-P. Park
Examining the relationship between differential item functioning and differential test functioning
Language Testing, October 1, 2006; 23(4): 475 - 496.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
W.-C. Wang and M. Wilson
Assessment of Differential Item Functioning in Testlet-Based Items Using the Rasch Testlet Model
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2005; 65(4): 549 - 576.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
H. Uiterwijk and T. Vallen
Linguistic sources of item bias for second generation immigrants in Dutch tests
Language Testing, April 1, 2005; 22(2): 211 - 234.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
W.-C. Wang and Y.-H. Su
Factors Influencing the Mantel and Generalized Mantel-Haenszel Methods for the Assessment of Differential Item Functioning in Polytomous Items
Applied Psychological Measurement, November 1, 2004; 28(6): 450 - 480.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
T.-I. Pae
DIF for examinees with different academic backgrounds
Language Testing, January 1, 2004; 21(1): 53 - 73.
[Abstract] [PDF]