Educational and Psychological Measurement

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zickar, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ury, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 62, No. 1, 19-31 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164402062001002
© 2002 SAGE Publications

Developing an Interpretation of Item Parameters for Personality Items: Content Correlates of Parameter Estimates

Michael J. Zickar

mzickar{at}bgnet.bgsu.edu

Karen L. Ury

Bowling Green State University

The research in this article attempted to relate content features of personality items to item parameter estimates from Muraki’s partial credit model. Goldberg’s Adjective Checklist was administered to 329 participants to calibrate item parameters. These parameters were then related to item ratings of social desirability, item subtlety, frequency of misunderstanding, and word usage frequency indexes. Subtle items tended to have lower discrimination parameter estimates. There was also an interaction between subtlety and social desirability such that items low in subtlety and high in social desirability had lower location parameters. Implications for future psychometric research in the personality domain are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
M. J. Zickar, R. E. Gibby, and C. Robie
Uncovering Faking Samples in Applicant, Incumbent, and Experimental Data Sets: An Application of Mixed-Model Item Response Theory
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2004; 7(2): 168 - 190.
[Abstract] [PDF]