Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hidalgo-Montesinos, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lopez-Pina, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Two-Stage Equating in Differential Item Functioning Detection under the Graded Response Model with the Raju Area Measures and the Lord Statistic

Maria Dolores Hidalgo-Montesinos

Jose Antonio Lopez-Pina

University of Murcia

The differential item functioning (DIF) detection in polytomous response items is an area of study of recent interest. Cohen and colleagues proposed a polytomous extension of the Lord statistic and the Raju exact area measures, when the items fit the graded response model. This study examined the effects of test purification in detecting DIF by means of polytomous extensions of the Raju area measures and the Lord statistic. The factors manipulated were percentage of DIF items in the test (5%, 10%, and 20%), amount of DIF (0.2, 0.4, and 0.8), sample size (250, 500, and 1,000) and test purification (noniterative versus two-stage). The results of this study suggest that the use of the two-stage equating procedure with Z(SA) and {chi}2-LORD reduces the percentage of false positives and improves the detection of DIF.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 62, No. 1, 32-44 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164402062001003
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
C. E. DeMars
Polytomous Differential Item Functioning and Violations of Ordering of the Expected Latent Trait by the Raw Score
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2008; 68(3): 379 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
W.-C. Wang and M. Wilson
Assessment of Differential Item Functioning in Testlet-Based Items Using the Rasch Testlet Model
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2005; 65(4): 549 - 576.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
A. M. Fidalgo, D. Ferreres, and J. MuNiz
Utility of the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure for Detecting Differential Item Functioning in Small Samples
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 2004; 64(6): 925 - 936.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
W.-C. Wang and Y.-L. Yeh
Effects of Anchor Item Methods on Differential Item Functioning Detection with the Likelihood Ratio Test
Applied Psychological Measurement, November 1, 2003; 27(6): 479 - 498.
[Abstract] [PDF]