Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Capraro, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Capraro, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Score Reliability Across: Studies a Meta-Analytic Reliability Generalization Study

Robert M. Capraro

Texas A&M Universityrcapraro{at}coe.tamu.edu

Mary Margaret Capraro

Texas A&M Universitymmcapraro{at}coe.tamu.edu

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) was submitted to a descriptive reliability generalization (RG) analysis to characterize the variability of measurement error in MBTI scores across administrations. In general, the MBTI and its scales yielded scores with strong internal consistency and test-retest reliability estimates, although variation was observed.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 62, No. 4, 590-602 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164402062004004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. L. Romano and J. D. Kromrey
What Are the Consequences If the Assumption of Independent Observations Is Violated in Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis Studies?
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2009; 69(3): 404 - 428.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
L. R. Zientek, M. M. Capraro, and R. M. Capraro
Reporting Practices in Quantitative Teacher Education Research: One Look at the Evidence Cited in the AERA Panel Report
Educational Researcher, May 1, 2008; 37(4): 208 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
R. J. De Ayala, D. J. Vonderharr-Carlson, and D. Kim
Assessing the Reliability of the Beck Anxiety Inventory Scores
Educational and Psychological Measurement, October 1, 2005; 65(5): 742 - 756.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
T. Vacha-Haase, R. K. Henson, and J. C. Caruso
Reliability Generalization: Moving toward Improved Understanding and Use of Score Reliability
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2002; 62(4): 562 - 569.
[Abstract] [PDF]