Educational and Psychological Measurement

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fidler, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 62, No. 5, 749-770 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/001316402236876

The Fifth edition of the Apa Publication Manual: Why its Statistics Recommendations are so Controversial

Fiona Fidler

La Trobe University (Bundoora, Australia) and The University of Melbournef.fidler1{at}pgrad.unimelb.edu.au

The fifth edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA) draws on recommendations for improving statistical practices made by the APA Task Force on Statistical Inference (TFSI). The manual now acknowledges the controversy over null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) and includes both a stronger recommendation to report effect sizes and a new recommendation to report confidence intervals. Drawing on interviews with some critics and other interested parties, the present review identifies a number of deficiencies in the new manual. These include lack of follow-through with appropriate explanations and examples of how to report statistics that are now recommended. At this stage, the discipline would be well served by a response to these criticisms and a debate over needed modifications.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav ModifHome page
R. I. Parker and S. Hagan-Burke
Median-Based Overlap Analysis for Single Case Data: A Second Study
Behav Modif, November 1, 2007; 31(6): 919 - 936.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
P. Natesan and B. Thompson
Extending Improvement-Over-Chance I-Index Effect Size Simulation Studies to Cover Some Small-Sample Cases
Educational and Psychological Measurement, February 1, 2007; 67(1): 59 - 72.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
C. A. Pierce, R. A. Block, and H. Aguinis
Cautionary Note on Reporting Eta-Squared Values from Multifactor ANOVA Designs
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 2004; 64(6): 916 - 924.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
R. Hubbard
Alphabet Soup: Blurring the Distinctions Betweenp's anda's in Psychological Research
Theory Psychology, June 1, 2004; 14(3): 295 - 327.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
H. Wainer and D. H. Robinson
Shaping Up the Practice of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing
Educational Researcher, October 1, 2003; 32(7): 22 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
M. M. Capraro and R. M. Capraro
Exploring the APA Fifth Edition Publication Manual's Impact on the Analytic Preferences of Journal Editorial Board Members
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2003; 63(4): 554 - 565.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
S. Pedersen
Effect Sizes and "What If" Analyses as Supplements to Statistical Significance Tests
Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 2003; 25(4): 310 - 319.
[Abstract] [PDF]