This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gelin, M. N. Articles by Zumbo, B. D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Differential Item Functioning Results May Change Depending On How An Item Is Scored: An Illustration With The Center For Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale

University of British Columbia

Bruno D. Zumbo

University of British Columbia

The present study investigated potentially biased scale items on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D). The 20-item CES-D was scored using two binary methods (presence and persistence) and one ordinal method. Gender differential item functioning (DIF) was explored using Zumbo’s OLR method with corresponding logistic regression effect size estimator with all three scoring methods. Gender DIF was found with the CES-D item "crying" for the ordinal and presence methods of scoring. The persistence scoring method identified two DIF items (effort and hopeful); however, this scoring method appears to be of limited use due to low variability on some items. Overall, the results indicate that the scoring method has an effect on DIF; thus, DIF is a property of the item, scoring method, and purpose of the instrument.

Key Words: item analysis • differential item functioning • depression; gender effects • CES-D

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 63, No. 1, 65-74 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164402239317


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Choi, L. Fogg, E. E. Lee, and M. Choi Wu Evaluating Differential Item Functioning of the CES-D Scale According to Caregiver Status and Cultural Context in Korean Women Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, August 1, 2009; 15(4): 240 - 248. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. O. Edelen, D. F. McCaffrey, G. N. Marshall, and L. H. Jaycox Measurement of Teen Dating Violence Attitudes: An Item Response Theory Evaluation of Differential Item Functioning According to Gender J Interpers Violence, August 1, 2009; 24(8): 1243 - 1263. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. D. Penfield, N. D. Myers, and E. W. Wolfe Methods for Assessing Item, Step, and Threshold Invariance in Polytomous Items Following the Partial Credit Model Educational and Psychological Measurement, October 1, 2008; 68(5): 717 - 733. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Escorial and M. J. Navas Analysis of the Gender Variable in the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised Scales Using Differential Item Functioning Techniques Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 2007; 67(6): 990 - 1001. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Gomez Australian Parent and Teacher Ratings of the DSM-IV ADHD Symptoms: Differential Symptom Functioning and Parent-Teacher Agreement and Differences J Atten Disord, July 1, 2007; 11(1): 17 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF]