Educational and Psychological Measurement

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beretvas, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Pastor, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 63, No. 1, 75-95 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164402239318

Using Mixed-Effects Models In Reliability Generalization Studies

S. Natasha Beretvas

University of Texas at Austin

Dena A. Pastor

Harcourt Educational Measurement

Traditionally, reliability generalization (RG) studies have used some form of the regression model to summarize score reliability of a measure across samples and examine conditions under which the reliability varies. Oftentimes, the assumptions underlying the use of multiple regression are not satisfied in RG studies. This article describes how the assumptions have been violated and introduces a more sophisticated technique, mixed-effects modeling, that can overcome many of the shortcomings of traditional approaches. A nontechnical introduction of mixed-effects models in the context of RG studies is provided along with an example using internal consistency reliability coefficients from the Beck Depression Inventory that compares results under the mixed-versus the fixed-effects models.

Key Words: reliability generalization studies • mixed-effects models • Beck Depression Inventory


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
S. N. Beretvas, M.-A. Suizzo, J. A. Durham, and L. M. Yarnell
A Reliability Generalization Study of Scores on Rotter's and Nowicki-Strickland's Locus of Control Scales
Educational and Psychological Measurement, February 1, 2008; 68(1): 97 - 119.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
C. Mason, R. Allam, and M. T. Brannick
How to Meta-Analyze Coefficient-of-Stability Estimates: Some Recommendations Based on Monte Carlo Studies
Educational and Psychological Measurement, October 1, 2007; 67(5): 765 - 783.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. S. Campbell, S. Pulos, M. Hogan, and F. Murry
Reliability Generalization of the Psychopathy Checklist Applied in Youthful Samples
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2005; 65(4): 639 - 656.
[Abstract] [PDF]