Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shields, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Caruso, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reliability Generalization of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test

Alan L. Shields

University of Montana

John C. Caruso

University of Montana

The present study evaluated the reliability of scores from the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in a reliability generalization study. This reliability generalization had two primary goals: (a) to characterize the typical reliability of scores for the AUDIT, and (b) to examine factors that may be related to the reliability of AUDIT scores. The median internal consistency reliability across 24 samples was .81, with a range of .59 to .91. Results suggest that the AUDIT is capable of generating generally reliable scores across some varied sample conditions. After controlling for score variability, no sample characteristic was a statistically significantly predictor of score reliability and effects were small. Only 17 of 104 empirical journal articles contained adequate psychometric information to be included in the present study.

Key Words: meta-analysis • reliability generalization • alcohol screening • the AUDIT

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 63, No. 3, 404-413 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164403063003004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
K. R. Rexrode, S. Petersen, and S. O'Toole
The Ways of Coping Scale: A Reliability Generalization Study
Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 2008; 68(2): 262 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
C. S. Miller, A. L. Shields, D. Campfield, K. A. Wallace, and R. D. Weiss
Substance Use Scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: An Exploration of Score Reliability Via Meta-Analysis
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 2007; 67(6): 1052 - 1065.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
A. Li and J. Bagger
The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR): A Reliability Generalization Study
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2007; 67(3): 525 - 544.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
D. J. Ryngala, A. L. Shields, and J. C. Caruso
Reliability Generalization of the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale
Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 2005; 65(2): 259 - 271.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
A. L. Shields and J. C. Caruso
A Reliability Induction and Reliability Generalization Study of the Cage Questionnaire
Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 2004; 64(2): 254 - 270.
[Abstract] [PDF]