Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Algina, J.
Right arrow Articles by Keselman, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Approximate Confidence Intervals for Effect Sizes

James Algina

University of Florida

H. J. Keselman

University of Manitoba

This article defines an approximate confidence interval for effect size in correlated (repeated measures) groups designs. The authors found that their method was much more accurate than the interval presented and acknowledged to be approximate by Bird. That is, the coverage probability over all the conditions investigated was very close to the theoretical .95 value. By contrast, Bird’s interval could have coverage probability that was substantially below .95. In addition, the authors’interval was less likely than Bird’s method to present an overly optimistic portrayal of the effect. They also examined the operating characteristics of the Bird interval for effect size in an independent groups design and found that, although it is fairly accurate in its approximation of coverage probability, the accuracy of the approximation does vary with the magnitude of the population effect size.

Key Words: effect size • confidence interval • between-subjects design • within-subjects design

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 63, No. 4, 537-553 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164403256358


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
A. R. Gilpin
requivalent, Meta-Analysis, and Robustness: An Empirical Examination of Rosenthal and Rubin's Effect Size Indicator
Educational and Psychological Measurement, February 1, 2008; 68(1): 42 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. Algina, H. J. Keselman, and R. D. Penfield
Effect Sizes and their Intervals: The Two-Level Repeated Measures Case
Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 2005; 65(2): 241 - 258.
[Abstract] [PDF]