This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Marcus, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

An Empirical Examination of the Construct Validity of Two Alternative Self-Control Measures

Chemnitz University of Technology, bernd.marcus{at}phil.tuchemnitz.de

The present study contrasts a newly developed measure of self-control as outlined in the General Theory of Crime, the Retrospective Behavioral Self-Control scale (RBS), with the most widespread measure of this construct. The RBS is based exclusively on an assessment of prior behavior with possible long-term negative consequences for the actor, whereas the latter scale is an example of attitudinal measures based on a listing of specific personality traits. By means of confirmatory factor analysis, it is demonstrated that the RBS measured the intended general factor of behavior across three samples, whereas the Grasmick et al. scale did not (only administered in one sample). In addition, the nomological net of self-control is explored by relating both instruments to a comprehensive battery of psychological tests and behavioral indicators. The RBS is included as an appendix.

Key Words: self-control • personality measures • general theory of crime • structural equations modeling • deviant behavior

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 63, No. 4, 674-706 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164403251329


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. M. Beaver, M. DeLisi, J. P. Wright, and M. G. Vaughn Gene--Environment Interplay and Delinquent Involvement: Evidence of Direct, Indirect, and Interactive Effects Journal of Adolescent Research, March 1, 2009; 24(2): 147 - 168. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Brennan, W. Dieterich, and B. Ehret Evaluating the Predictive Validity of the Compas Risk and Needs Assessment System Criminal Justice and Behavior, January 1, 2009; 36(1): 21 - 40. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. M. Beaver, J. Eagle Schutt, B. B. Boutwell, M. Ratchford, K. Roberts, and J.C. Barnes Genetic and Environmental Influences on Levels of Self-Control and Delinquent Peer Affiliation: Results from a Longitudinal Sample of Adolescent Twins Criminal Justice and Behavior, January 1, 2009; 36(1): 41 - 60. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. DeLisi, A. Hochstetler, G. E. Higgins, K. M. Beaver, and C. M. Graeve Toward a General Theory of Criminal Justice: Low Self-Control and Offender Noncompliance Criminal Justice Review, June 1, 2008; 33(2): 141 - 158. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. E. Higgins Examining the Original Grasmick Scale: A Rasch Model Approach Criminal Justice and Behavior, February 1, 2007; 34(2): 157 - 178. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. D. Morris, P. B. Wood, and R. G. Dunaway Self-Control, Native Traditionalism, and Native American Substance Use: Testing the Cultural Invariance of a General Theory of Crime Crime Delinquency, October 1, 2006; 52(4): 572 - 598. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Oberwittler and S. Hofer Crime and Justice in Germany: An Analysis of Recent Trends and Research European Journal of Criminology, October 1, 2005; 2(4): 465 - 508. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Marcus Self-Control in the General Theory of Crime:: Theoretical Implications of a Measurement Problem Theoretical Criminology, February 1, 2004; 8(1): 33 - 55. [Abstract] [PDF]