Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boudrias, J.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Laschinger, H. K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Testing the Structure of Psychological Empowerment: Does Gender Make a Difference?

Jean-Sébastien Boudrias

University of Montreal

Patrick Gaudreau

University of Montreal

Heather K. Spence Laschinger

University of Western Ontario

Psychological empowerment (PE) is presumed to be a second-order latent construct composed of four dimensions: meaning, competence, self-determination, and impact. Based on the results of two validation studies, it has been hypothesized that loadings of the four dimensions on PE could vary across gender groups. A multiple-group second-order confirmatory factor analysis was performed to verify if the factor structure of Spreitzer’s PE questionnaire was invariant between groups of 191 male and 200 female nurses. Results indicated that the structure of the PE questionnaire could be assumed invariant across genders. Directions for future research are discussed.

Key Words: empowerment • employee attitudes • gender • measurement • factor structure

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 64, No. 5, 861-877 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164404264840
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
S. Kim
Testing the Structure of Public Service Motivation in Korea: A Research Note
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., October 1, 2009; 19(4): 839 - 851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
S. Kim
Revising Perry's Measurement Scale of Public Service Motivation
The American Review of Public Administration, March 1, 2009; 39(2): 149 - 163.
[Abstract] [PDF]