Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feldt, L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Estimating the Reliability of Dichotomous or Trichotomous Scores

Leonard S. Feldt

The University of Iowa

To meet the requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act, school districts and states must compile summary reports of the levels of student achievement in reading and mathematics. The levels are to be described in broad categories: "basic and below," "proficient," or "advanced." Educational units are given considerable latitude in defining the percentile limits of these categories and the measures to be used in assessing the levels of each student. However, they must defend the validity and reliability of these measures. The question arises: How does one estimate the reliability of a score generated by a test of k items after the score is reduced to three or even two values? A precise solution, based on normality assumptions, requires the application of computer programs inaccessible to most local educators. Tables are provided in this article that enable local educators to deduce the reliability of broad-category scores ({rho}yy') from the reliability of the original scores ({rho}xx').

Key Words: reliability coefficient • dichotomous score reliability • trichotomous score reliability • parallel-forms reliability

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 65, No. 1, 28-41 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164404264851
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?