Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelley, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Effects of Nonnormal Distributions on Confidence Intervals Around the Standardized Mean Difference: Bootstrap and Parametric Confidence Intervals

Ken Kelley

University of Notre Dame, kkelley{at}nd.edu

The standardized group mean difference, Cohen’s d, is among the most commonly used and intuitively appealing effect sizes for group comparisons. However, reporting this point estimate alone does not reflect the extent to which sampling error may have led to an obtained value. A confidence interval expresses the uncertainty that exists between d and the population value, {delta}, it represents. A set of Monte Carlo simulations was conducted to examine the integrity of a noncentral approach analogous to that given by Steiger and Fouladi, as well as two bootstrap approaches in situations in which the normality assumption is violated. Because d is positively biased, a procedure given by Hedges and Olkin is outlined, such that an unbiased estimate of {delta} can be obtained. The bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap confidence interval using the unbiased estimate of {delta} is proposed and recommended for general use, especially in cases in which the assumption of normality may be violated.

Key Words: effect size • standardized effect size • confidence intervals • bootstrap methods • nonnormal data

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 65, No. 1, 51-69 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164404264850


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
L. Z. Garamszegi, S. Calhim, N. Dochtermann, G. Hegyi, P. L. Hurd, C. Jorgensen, N. Kutsukake, M. J. Lajeunesse, K. A. Pollard, H. Schielzeth, et al.
Changing philosophies and tools for statistical inferences in behavioral ecology
Behav. Ecol., November 2, 2009; (2009) arp137v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. Algina, H. J. Keselman, and R. D. Penfield
Confidence Interval Coverage for Cohen's Effect Size Statistic
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 2006; 66(6): 945 - 960.
[Abstract] [PDF]