Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, W.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, C.-T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Item Parameter Recovery, Standard Error Estimates, and Fit Statistics of the Winsteps Program for the Family of Rasch Models

Wen-Chung Wang

National Chung Cheng University, psywcw{at}ccu.edu.tw

Cheng-Te Chen

National Chung Cheng University

This study investigates item parameter recovery, standard error estimates, and fit statistics yielded by the WINSTEPS program under the Rasch model and the rating scale model through Monte Carlo simulations. The independent variables were item response model, test length, and sample size. WINSTEPS yielded practically unbiased estimates for the difficulty parameters under the Rasch model and the overall difficulty parameters under the rating scale model. However, the estimates for the intersection parameters under the rating scale model were substantially biased, especially for short tests. The standard errors of the overall difficulties and intersection parameters were slightly underestimated. The cube root-transformed weighted and unweighted item fit statistics did not follow the standard normal distribution in that their empirical sampling variances were much smaller than the expected value of unity. Correction procedures were proposed to make them follow approximately the standard normal distribution so that the usual critical ranges at the {alpha} nominal level could be used to screen the misfitting items.

Key Words: Rasch model • rating scale model • joint maximum likelihood estimation • infit • outfit

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 65, No. 3, 376-404 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164404268673


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
S. L. Decker
Measuring Growth and Decline in Visual-Motor Processes With the Bender-Gestalt Second Edition
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, March 1, 2008; 26(1): 3 - 15.
[Abstract] [PDF]