|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
A Construct-Related Validity Study on a Korean Version of the Perceptual Learning Styles Preference Questionnaire
Ian Isemonger
Kochi Women's University
Chris Sheppard
Waseda University
This study examined the factor structure of a Korean version of the Perceptual Learning Styles Preference Questionnaire. The instrument was developed to measure the learning-style preferences of students of English as a second language and English as a foreign language and has gained wide currency as a classroom diagnostic tool and survey instrument for research on second-language acquisition. Reliability estimates (Cronbach's ) for scores on the six scales hypothesized by Reid were generally not good and corroborated results in the limited number of previous studies. A confirmatory factor analysis led to the rejection of the hypothesized model, and an exploratory factor analysis suggested a three-factor model as more appropriate. It is argued that the results of this study indicate that the instrument is flawed and that the results of previous research based on it are questionable. It is also argued that the continued use of the instrument within the research trajectory of second-language acquisition be suspended until the instrument has been revised.
Key Words: PLSP learning styles perceptual learning styles second-language acquisition
Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 67, No. 2,
357-368 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164406292073

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Isemonger
Scores on a Japanese-Language Version of the Learning Channel Preference Checklist: A Questionable Instrument Within a Questionable Line of Instrumentation
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,
June 1, 2008;
26(2):
148 - 155.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|